Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01894
Original file (PD 2014 01894.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2014-01894
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 20140701
SEPARATION DATE: 20060217


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty A1C/E-3 (3P031/Security Forces Apprentice) medically separated for chronic right ankle pain. The right ankle condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Air Force Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued an L4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). “Chronic right ankle pain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic right ankle pain” as unfitting, rated 10%, re ferencing application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). “Overweight” was listed as a Category III condition. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please consider all conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting right ankle condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. “Overweight” is a condition not constituting a physical disability IAW DODI 1332.38, Enclosure 5. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20051213
 VA - (3.5 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Right Ankle Pain 5299-5271 10% Right Ankle Sprain 5299-5271 10% 20060531
Overweight Cat III - Not Compensable No VA Entry
Other x 0 (Not is Scope)
 Other x 1 20060531
Rating: 10%
 Combined Rating: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 60707 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Ankle Pain. The narrative summary noted a right ankle sprain in February 2004 that continued to be symptomatic despite splinting, profile restriction and physical therapy. Plain X-rays were normal and magnetic resonance imaging indicated swelling without any other abnormality. Bone scan performed in October 2004 documented non-specific bilateral foot stress reactions and shin splints. Medications (Mobic and Pamelor) decreased symptoms and allowed return to running. However, the CI re-sprained her right ankle in September 2005 (X-ray documented swelling only), the CI required another profile restriction and subsequent referral to MEB.

The MEB physical exam performed 3.5 months prior to separation noted a normal appearing right ankle with no tenderness and “full active range of motion.” Gait was normal and sensory, motor and reflex exams were normal. The examiner opined that the CI was “continually prone to recurrent right ankle sprains, right dorsal foot tendonitis and bilateral shin splints whenever attempting to run.” The final diagnosis was chronic right ankle pain.

At the VA Compensation and Pension exam performed 3.5 months after separation, the CI reported the same right ankle injury history and was on continued medications. Symptoms included continual pain with increases up to nine of ten with episodic swelling, stiffness and feeling of weakness and flare-ups. She stated that the ankle had locked and given way “a couple of times” and seemed to roll easily. She had a brace that she used at times. On exam, the ankle appeared normal with active range-of-motion of 10 degrees dorsiflexion (20 degrees normal) and plantar flexion to 50 degrees (45 degrees normal), with painful motion noted. There was generalized ankle tenderness without any focal tenderness. There was no laxity, weakness or muscle atrophy noted. Gait was normal including walking on heels and toes with repetitive toe raises. The VA rated this exam at 10% for moderate limitation of dorsiflexion.

VA records indicated the CI’s ankle continued to be symptomatic with right ankle diagnoses of capulosynovitis and tibiotalar arthropathy that did not respond to conservative treatment. The CI underwent right ankle arthroscopic surgery in July 2007 (17 months after separation) to remove infolded tissue (with a temporary 100% VA rating effective on 10 July 2007) with return to a 10% rating effective September 2007. Later exam and VA rating in 2009 indicated a continued 10% rating with changed disability code to 5271-5020 (synovitis) since there was no longer pain-limited motion for rating under code 5271.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Both the PEB and VA rated the right ankle condition at 10% using coding analogous to 5271 (ankle, limited motion), mild. The Board deliberated if any coding schema for the ankle would warrant higher than the 10% rating; however, there was insufficient evidence of marked limitation of ankle motion to warrant higher rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the right ankle condition. The Board concluded therefore that this condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.

Contended PEB Condition (Overweight). The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that the overweight condition was not compensable. “Overweight” is a condition not constituting a physical disability IAW DODI 1332.38, Enclosure 5., and the Board agreed with the PEB adjudication of Category III (not separately unfitting and not compensable or ratable). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB Category III determination for the contended overweight condition and so no additional disability ratings are recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right ankle condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the contended overweight condition, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend it for additional disability rating. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140501, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAF/MRB
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:

         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2014-01894.

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.

                                                               Sincerely,





         
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02228

    Original file (PD-2013-02228.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2013-02228BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCEBOARD DATE: 20140731 SEPARATION DATE: 20050215 I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01402

    Original file (PD-2013-01402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considers DVA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12-month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. The VA rated the right ankle condition (right ankle instability) 10%,coded 5024-5271 (tenosynovitis - limitation of ankle motion) citing instability and limitation of motion that was not more than moderate. The right ankle limitation of motion recorded at the time of the MEB NARSUM examination was mild.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01105

    Original file (PD2012 01105.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEBfound the chronic right ankle pain unfitting, and rated it0%.The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 0% disability rating. The Army PEB and VA chose different coding and rating options for the right ankle condition. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02566

    Original file (PD-2013-02566.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The requested back condition, which was determined to be not unfitting by the PEB, is likewise addressed below.The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which her serviceconnected condition continues to burden her; but must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. At the MEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01529

    Original file (PD-2013-01529.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. On 25 June 2004 a formal goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) testing from physical therapy was referenced in the NARSUM and documented active ROM of 0 degrees dorsiflexion (normal 20 degrees) and 30 degrees plantar...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00348

    Original file (PD-2012-00348.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FPEB adjudicated the testicular and right ankle pain conditions as unfitting, rated 0% and 0% respectively, and was then medically separated with a 0% combined disability rating. The PEB assigned a 0% rating coded analogous to 8730 (neuralgia ilioinguinal nerve) for moderate pain and while the original VA rating decision assigned a 0% rating, a rating decision 8 months post separation increased the rating to 10% for severe pain after a request was made to reopen the case. I have...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02077

    Original file (PD-2013-02077.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ankle condition, characterized as “chronic left ankle pain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. Post-SeparationConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Ankle Pain5099-50030%Left Ankle Condition5271NSC*STROther x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 7 Rating: 0%Rating: NSCDerived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20070706(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). The MEB NARSUM performed on 11 February...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01115

    Original file (PD-2013-01115.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Likewise, this degree of limitedmotion is not consistent with the ability to run 300 meters (as the CI reported he could do), to perform some activities allowed on his permanent profile, or to complete alternate aerobic fitness events.Finally, the VA note 6 months after separation suggested that the ankle pain was not “constant” as previously reported by the NARSUM examiner. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01642

    Original file (PD 2012 01642.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20030321VA –STR UsedConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Ankle Pain Secondary to Bone Effusion Effect5099-500310%Sprain, Left Ankle 5299-527110%STROther x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 5STR Rating: 10%Rating: 10%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20030711(most proximate to date of separation) Left Ankle Condition .The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes the CI had a history of multiple sprains of the ankle and experienced an avulsion...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01490

    Original file (PD-2014-01490.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Pre-SepVA C&P ~10 Days Pre-Sep Dorsiflexion (20 Normal) 5,5,7 5 Plantar Flexion (45) 30,32,3530 Comment Antalgic gait, with pain (passive w/in 2 degrees of active ROM Gait normal §4.71a Rating 20% (FPEB 10%) 20% (VA 20%)The Board directed its attention to its rating...